And Remove All Doubt
The quote, often mistakenly attributed to Mark Twain is,
"It is better to remain silent at
the risk of being thought a fool, than to talk and remove all doubt of it."
or, it is in the earliest found source of the quote. Today Louis C.K. opened
his mouth and removed all doubt. Not that he's a fool, the history of comedy
includes a rich history of playing the fool, and many of us don't mind being
thought fools, at least when we're "on". No, Louis revealed that he's
"behaved inappropriately" towards the five women in the New York
Times article. Since I don't shy away from profanity, the inappropriate
behavior in question is him asking for permission to masturbate, then whipping
out his dick and doing so...in his confession, he describes why it's a problem,
and it seems like he understands the power dynamic at play, so I won't bother
repeating his words. I do find it odd that he comes off like this inverse
relationship between power and consent just recently occurred to him. Five
women came forward, and I'd bet that there are more who haven't, did he never
stop to think that maybe, just maybe, releasing your donger and firing off some
knuckle children in front of people you're not in a relationship with might be
a little creepy? I find it hard to believe that anyone could be insightful
enough to make a successful career in comedy yet so oblivious that they'd fail
to see a problem with this behavior.
Full disclosure: I used to be a Louis C.K fan. If this were
a Mitch Hedburg joke, I'd follow that up with "I still am, but I used to
be, too". Except I don't know that I am any longer. I've never been as
into his work as I've been the works of people like Patton Oswalt or George
Carlin, and frankly his work isn't anywhere near the same league as those guys.
I haven't bothered checking out any of his recent stuff, and I want to tell
myself that it has nothing to do with the accusations that have been floating
around him for the last couple of years, but does it? I honestly don't know,
and I that's not the question that matters. Will I ever be able to look at any
of his work going forward and not feel like a shit? Also doesn't matter. This
has me in a weird spot. Cosby wasn't relevant to me. Weinstein was just some
guy who funded pretty much everything, this is (as far as I can recall) the
first time someone I kind of looked up to was pegged as being a creep. His
career is certainly on a hiatus for the foreseeable future, but he seems to
have "fuck you" money, and dealing with the familial fallout is
probably going to be his priority for now. What I really want to know, though,
is how does he make this right? Is it even possible to do so?
I'll say this much though, it hasn't even been twenty-four
hours and I'm already sick to death of seeing the phrase "This is a good
first step". Taking that ten thousand foot view of the situation, his
first step was to unleash little Louis and proceed to peel his chili. His second
step was to lie about it for a couple of years. At best, this is the third
step. More to the point, these commentators who seem so eager to give him
absolution? Don't. Fucking. Matter.
Comments
Post a Comment